Direct answer
Agency pricing for social media collaboration tools is only comparable when you normalize team-member, brand or workspace, and channel limits alongside approval workflow, client review, permissions, and billing terms. Markish publishes its Agency price and capacity in the plan summary below. Its platform supports team review and external client review links, but plan access to client links is not confirmed in the entitlement catalog.
Why an agency price comparison needs more than a monthly number
An agency can appear to be comparing the same thing while one plan is priced by user, another by channel, another by workspace, and another by a custom quote. Approval and client review features can also sit on different tiers. Start with the dimensions that determine whether the plan fits the agency’s actual operating model.
- Team members: How many internal people can work in the product?
- Brands or workspaces: How many client contexts can remain separate?
- Channels: How many connected social channels fit in the plan?
- Workflow: Does the plan provide one-step, multi-step, advanced, or custom approval?
- Client review: Does it provide a link for client approval, an internal user seat, or another review mechanism?
- Controls and record: Are internal comments, roles, access levels, channel permissions, approval history, and audit history included?
- Billing terms: Is the price monthly, annual, per user, per channel, or a quote? Confirm taxes and checkout currency before buying.
Markish Agency plan: published collaboration facts
The current Markish Agency plan details are rendered above from the site’s pricing source of truth. It is published as a monthly NPR plan. The platform supports review and approval before publishing, but the entitlement catalog does not confirm plan-specific review stages, permission levels, or history limits. External client review links do not imply that a client receives a full internal Markish workspace account.
For agencies with larger capacity needs, Agency Pro has higher social account, brand, workspace, and team-member limits. Enterprise has custom pricing and published capacity caps. Plan prices on this site have not been verified against the platform catalog; check the current pricing page and confirm your requirements with the team.
Comparing current vendor pricing responsibly
The current public pricing and packaging for Buffer, Hootsuite, and Sprout Social should be checked directly before making a purchase decision. Their published prices, billing units, feature packaging, and regional terms may change.
Use the same worksheet for every vendor:
| Comparison dimension | Why it changes the agency cost |
|---|---|
| Team seats and roles | A lower base plan may not include the number of contributors, reviewers, and publishers the agency needs. |
| Brands, workspaces, or client groups | The agency needs a way to keep client content and approval context distinct. |
| Channels or social accounts | Pricing may scale by channel or account instead of by workspace. |
| Approval and client review | Confirm the tier that includes multi-stage review, client review, and any permission controls. |
| Publishing and history | Check whether the plan includes the publishing workflow, approval record, and required retention period. |
Match the plan to the workflow
For a small team, the deciding factor may be team-member capacity. For a client-service agency, the deciding factor is often the combination of social account, brand, workspace, and team-member capacity, plus any client review-link access the agency needs. A useful evaluation should include a real draft moving through feedback, revision, approval, scheduling, and publishing for more than one brand.
Explore Markish for marketing agencies, social media team collaboration, social media approval workflows, and the full Markish pricing matrix.